Search for: "United States v. Man" Results 6241 - 6260 of 6,943
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2009, 6:38 am
Later in 1968 Stokes was elected to the United States Congress and served 15 consecutive terms in the U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:16 pm
The other case set for 28 April is United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:04 pm
The criminal codes of the United States and of all 50 states have many similarities and some definable differences between them. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor)   Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP)   United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:49 am
Posts by Lyle Denniston here and here  provide the basic story of Hayes, which will appear (and may be reported) to be just a technical little statutory interpretation case: The Court has issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:37 pm
  Even while ordering the transfer, Congress officially designated the one acre plot with the cross as “a national memorial commemorating United States participation in World War I and honoring the American veterans of that war. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:42 am
  On Tuesday, the Wisconsin Supreme Court (somewhat reluctantly) ruled against a man who had a faulty Medtronic defibrillator upholding Riegel v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Public Knowledge)   US Copyright – Decisions S D Ohio: RIAA’s need for discovery was not so urgent: Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
In the Amalfitano case, the Amalfitano's attorneys reference legislation promulgated in 1275.The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certified two questions to the Court of Appeals concerning the application of Section 487 of the Judiciary Law insofar as it provides that:"[a]n attorney or counselor who: . . . is guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party . . . [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 12:51 am
The Star-Bulletin features a longish piece today highlighting an interview with Retired Hawaii Supreme Court Associate Justice Steven Levinson who authored the 1993 decision Baehr v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 11:37 am
The issue that will be argued in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
The Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (DOMA) provides in pertinent part:In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word "marriage" means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife and the word "spouse" refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife.DOMA is a pretty nasty law,… [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 12:07 pm
I've uploaded a copy of the defense motion to dismiss in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]