Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 6241 - 6260 of 9,871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2013, 7:44 am by The Charge
  Thus, the state of Maryland did not offend the United States Constitution when it denied counsel to Mr. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:09 am by Marissa Miller
” At Buzzfeed, Chris Geidner explains how the Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
Brief of the United States U.S. v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Fred Schauer on coverage v. protection; Robert Post on transfers of information that are regulated, like securities law; sexual harassment; antitrust—Eugene Volokh says that antitrust couldn’t be constitutionally applied against Google. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:52 am by Ryan Emenaker
Congress for its part nearly passed an override to the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner Jeffrey Lee Chafin was a citizen of the United States and a sergeant first class in the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm by Ron Coleman
The Court stated that, as a general matter, “[a] service provider is not, we think, permitted willful blindness. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:30 am by Conor McEvily
United States, a case involving the “anti-harboring” provision in Alabama’s 2011 immigration law, making it a crime to help undocumented immigrants enter or live in the state. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
(In 2003, Eric Robert Rudolph was convicted of the bombing and sentenced to life imprisonment.) [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:28 am by Thomas Merrill
Tuesday’s oral argument in Tarrant Water District v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:34 am by WSLL
He challenged his convictions on a number of grounds, and contended that his sentence of life without the possibility of parole is unconstitutional under the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Miller v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am by Conor McEvily
United States, the Court is considering whether the “recommendation” of a government attorney is intangible property that can be the subject of an extortion attempt under the Hobbs Act. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:21 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)In his pun-filled, 10-page decision in Lee v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm by John Bellinger
  But allowing ATS cases against U.S. corporations based on domicile alone would give insufficient weight to Roberts’ statement that the claims themselves must “touch and concern the territory of the United States,” which would seem to suggest that some element of the conduct must occur in the United States. [read post]