Search for: "University System v. State"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 8,144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2011, 10:37 am
They include a federal Nepal, various group rights, and a voting system of proportional representation. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
The Court of Appeal in R. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:29 am
"I know they are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in the Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
’l, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:59 am
Editor's note: We asked Alli Condra, who is pursuing her LL.M. in Agricultural and Food Law at the University of Arkansas, and is the recipient of the Marler Clark Graduate Assistantship, to give us the legal background on import alerts. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 12:13 pm
The following contribution to our arbitration symposium is by Nancy Welsh, Professor of Law at Penn State University, Dickinson School of Law. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:36 am
In Rent-A-Center, West Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:55 am
As users have to accept the new terms in order to log on to the Sony system, and given that many will do so without even reading the new conditions, some have criticised the change [Some courts have held that terms which no-one can be reasonably expected to read don't form part of the contract: see eg McCutcheon v MacBrayne]. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:54 pm
State Bar of Arizona; Goldfarb v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Limited (IIPRD Blog) Delhi HC’s ruling on the ‘guiding principle’ of public domain & fair use: Syndicate of the Press of the University of Cambridge v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
First, under the plurality test enunciated in O’Connor v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 10:44 am
Under a Supreme Court decision called Printz v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am
(Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps A10 Networks – Failure to timely produce source code and violation of protective order warrant attorneys’ fee sanction at $630 blended rate: Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:59 pm
. ————————- A white Texan denied admission to the state’s flagship university told the Supreme Court Thursday that it may need to reconsider its most recent ruling on the use of race in college admissions, arguing that a federal appeals court stretched that ruling so far as to permit a system of “blatant racial balancing.” The argument was made as the closely watched case of Fisher v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:43 pm
We then move from international criminal courts to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights with Lisl Brunner’s piece which explores the recent Gelman v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:20 pm
In American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
Stanford University (1989)). [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
HM Advocate v P. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:53 pm
In Business Roundtable v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
