Search for: "50 Doe Defendants" Results 6261 - 6280 of 7,321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2010, 8:00 am by Kinny Bagga
  Defendants’ also noted that because eBay had not submitted to the company’s Right of First Refusal agreement, it is currently able to sell its entire stake without triggering the Rights Plan and without Board approval, provided it does not sell more than 15% of the company to a single purchaser. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:47 am
STATELeagle.comThe Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides that before the trial court accepts a plea of guilty or nolo contendere from a defendant, it shall inquire as ...See all stories on this topic   Building Bridges: MARCH 2010 EDITIONBy Prison Action Network This year the Coalition for Fair Criminal Justice Policies, an outgrowth of FED4, will bring their proposed revision of Exec. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Lerach does not come off sympathetically, but he does come off as a real person – corrupt, deeply flawed, but real. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
(Actually, I do own more shares than I used to, due to the January 2010 50-for-1 split of the B shares.) [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:56 pm
" Justice Department Settles Kickback Case With Troutman Sanders Partner The American Lawyer The former head of Troutman Sanders' real estate investments and capitalization practice groups is one of five defendants to reach a $14 million civil settlement with federal prosecutors Friday stemming from an alleged $50 million kickback scheme. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 1:10 pm by Kenneth Anderson
Nils Melzer’s treatise, Targeted Killing in International Law (Oxford 2008), which I see is now out in paperback at $50 (but no Kindle edition). [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 10:45 am by John Watkins
Insureds, whether businesses or individuals, are left to defend and settle claims with their own resources. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
However, an award of attorneys' fees to a prevailing defendant is appropriate in much more limited circumstances.In Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:59 pm
Why does that problem seem so familiar? [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
BennettHeld: A covenant not to compete is enforceable even where the competing former employee does not solicit his former employer's clients or use its confidential information if the scope of the restrictive covenant is limited to reasonable temporal and geographical limits, the employer is protecting legitimate business interests with the covenant, the employee has unique and specialized skills, there is no undue hardship on the employee to comply with the restriction and the public… [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:41 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
So, if only 50% of eligible claims are submitted, then defendants may wind up paying only half of the agreed-upon amount, with the rest reverting to defendants, though the plaintiffs’ attorneys still collect fees on the full settlement amount. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:15 pm
New Mexico's law on punitive damages does not look favorably on corporate behavior that puts the safety and lives of New Mexico consumers at risk. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:40 pm
 As codified, loss causation requires a showing that the defendant “caused the loss for which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:20 pm by The Complex Litigator
The Second Interim Report also examined data to test the hypothesis that class certification pressures settlements from defendants. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:05 am by nyinjuries
For 50 years spanning 3 generations, we have obtained results for satisfied clients. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:56 pm by MacIsaac
       Reasonable equality does not mean that the defendant must be able to match expert for expert or report for report. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:09 pm by MacIsaac
Hurwitz, does have a postgraduate specialist degree in both disciplines. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am by Beck, et al.
 • Private litigants challenge practices and product approvals the FDA might considers legal and beneficial. 531 U.S. at 349-50 (describing attacks upon products with “accepted and necessary” off-label uses).Private litigants seek different and more drastic penalties – usually monetary – than the FDA considers wise. [read post]