Search for: "AT&T Services Inc. " Results 6261 - 6280 of 17,730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2017, 4:45 am by Mitchell Stabbe
  That honor went to a company called Intersport, Inc., which used the mark for sports programs it produced and registered the mark in 1989. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 6:09 am
Antitrust Agencies: 2006–2015 Posted by Cagatay Koç and Joseph T. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 4:25 am by Broc Romanek
The House Financial Services Committee was expected to approve the same bill on Thursday. [read post]
In 2014, the OIG issued an unfavorable advisory opinion in response to a specialty pharmacy’s proposal to pay local retail pharmacies that don’t dispense specialty drugs a fee for certain “support services” provided in connection with referring patients to the specialty pharmacy.[9] These “support services” would include services such as accepting prescriptions for specialty drugs, recording the patient’s medication… [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am by Ron Coleman
Both companies provided services related to private jets. . . . [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:51 pm by John A. Gallagher
Servs., Inc., 387 Fed.Appx. 179, 183 (3d Cir. 2010), the plaintiff asked the Court to reconsider Ford’sruling that that a place of public accommodation must “a physical place open to public access. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Kass didn’t know, the lawsuit states, until she followed up with the charities. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:05 pm by JAntonelli
Have you received a letter from Salt Lake City law firm Kirton McConkie attorney Todd Zenger about the LHF Productions, Inc. lawsuit? [read post]
ABC
5 Mar 2017, 8:34 am by Andrew Delaney
Great Northern Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:31 am by Jim Sedor
Lois Court said, “frequently it’s because there is a lobbyist available to help – that kind of knocks out those who can’t afford lobbyists. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 3:14 am
March 14, 2017 -11 AM: In re S & T Bank, Serial No. 86590754 et al. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 10:34 am by Matthew Schoonover
GAO recently affirmed this principle in Pitney Bowes, Inc., B-413876.2 (Feb. 13, 2017), when it sustained a protest challenging a solicitation’s requirements as being unduly restrictive of competition. [read post]