Search for: "All Defendants" Results 6261 - 6280 of 165,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” A final order is defined as any order that:  (1) disposes of all claims and of all parties; (2) is explicitly defined as a final order by statute; or (3) is entered as a final order pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 341(c). [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 4:05 am by SHG
I didn’t have enough time to give it, or the energy to give it because I had to deal with all these other factors. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 5:42 am by SHG
Rodgers, the executive director of the Center for the Advancement of Public Integrity at Columbia Law School and a former federal prosecutor, said she believed that all three men would eventually lose their appeals. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:22 am by Jani
In this writer's opinion the future of flavor trademarks seems very grim, but as a connoisseur of all things culinary, I am quite glad that the world of food isn't shackled by commercial interests; at least not unduly.Source: JDSupra [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:35 am
All of these defendants are now serving life sentences in California because of the Three Strikes rule. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:15 am by Kelly Hughes
It was a slow week at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) with just 18 new petitions—all inter partes reviews (IPRs); in district court, a slightly below average 54 new patent filings and 48 terminations rounded out the count. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 8:59 am
The defendant claims that the court abused its discretion (1) in fashioning orders of support because the court (a) calculated alimony based on gross income, (b) ordered him to obtain life insurance without a factual basis to do so and (c) ordered him to provide impracticable financial support, (2) by awarding all of the parties’ real property to the plaintiff, (3) by ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiff $8000 in attorney’s fees and (4) by failing… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 8:22 am
" As long as the facts or data are "reasonably relied on" by such experts, the evidence need not even be admissible.Placing this rule in context, all of the below bases of an expert psychiatrist's testimony concerning the psychiatric condition of a criminal defendant is permissible:The witness's pre-testimony psychiatric treatment of defendant;A different expert's testimony about psychological tests scores of the defendant;A… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:01 pm by Doug Austin
Jones granted in part and denied in part the defendant’s motion to compel, ruling that the plaintiff had not shown that a consultant to the plaintiff met the criterion of being considered a “functional employee” for which all communications with the plaintiff could be considered privileged, but denying the defendant’s request for preclusion sanctions,...Read the whole entry... [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:32 pm
Our Boston car accident lawyers know defendants will file pre-trial motions to dismiss in nearly all negligence cases. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:30 am by Brandee Bower
They looked to the Arizona Supreme Court’s statement2 that “[w]hile it is clear that an insurer may defend a fairly debatable claim, all that means is that it may not defend one that is not fairly debatable. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:14 pm by Jon Sands
All present here, which resulted in a vacation and remand and reassignment. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:03 pm by Jon Katz
For clients who committed no crime at all, I know as a Virginia criminal attorney that too many innocent people get prosecuted, but we are still in the risk-taking mode in defending against prosecution. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:15 am by Docket Navigator
However, the Court declines [defendant's] request to exclude all of the material that [defendant] identified as related to these perspectives. . . . [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:39 pm by Jon Sands
The other Rule 11 requirements were all met. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:46 am by Karen Breda
Cole, circulated a memorandum to all federal prosecutors announcing a new policy on waivers of ineffective assistance of counsel claims: Federal prosecutors should no longer seek in plea agreements to have a defendant waive claims of ineffective assistance of counsel whether those claims are made on collateral attack or, when permitted by circuit law, made on direct appeal. [read post]