Search for: "Davis v. Davis" Results 6261 - 6280 of 8,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am by Barbara Bavis
Saint- Gérard attributes this theory to American botanist Wade Davis). [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Amy Howe
Davis (April 24): Whether ineffective assistance of counsel at the state post-conviction stage can overcome the failure to bring a substantial claim that an inmate’s appellate counsel was constitutionally ineffective. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 9:51 pm
A judgment as a matter of law may not be granted in the Fifth Circuit unless "there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find as the jury did" (Hiltgen v Sumrall 1995). [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY - NONCOOPERATION - EUO - SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE - NEGLIGENCE CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST PROPERTY INSURER - DEFAMATION CLAIM AGAINST SPECIAL INVESTIGATOR - PUNITIVE DAMAGES LeBaron v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am by Jasmine Joseph
However, at the time Davis was decided, the Court had earlier determined in Griggs v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The Mischon de Reya website has a post about the CJEU decision in WS v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The trial in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics was heard by Nicola Davies J on 16, 17 and 20 July 2018 and is part heard, continuing on 23 July 2018. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:20 am by Mike Inman
No Pet Policy Does Not Violate State or Federal Fair Housing Acts Hawn v. [read post]
This post in our Landmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series discusses the Montana Supreme Court’s consideration of an insurer’s duty to defend in National Indemnity Co. v. [read post]