Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 9,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2009, 2:27 pm
Longhi v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:59 am
Supreme Court amicus brief on behalf of UNHCR in Negusie v Mukasey, an asylum case on which IntLawGrrl Jaya Ramji-Nogales has posted. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:14 pm
A recent example of the power of such a court order arose in the case of Nazerali v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:02 am
EEOC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:30 am
” Rothy’s, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 5:40 pm
In Jurney v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:05 pm
____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences § 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - = Backspace Tab q w e r t y u i o p [ ] Return capslock a s d f g h j k l ; ‘ \ shift ` z x c v b n m , . / shift English Deutsch Español Français Italiano … [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:40 pm
Accordingly, in McQuillan v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 2:07 pm
The Golden Rule was established in an opinion written by judge Templeman in Kenward v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
Although Roshco knew Ito was Japanese, and spoke and understood little English, her language barrier argument is not sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:25 pm
He was ultimately rescued by fishermen working off a mother ship, the Duarte V. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:32 pm
I suspect the critical figure in this, ahem, narrative, is Fernand Braudel: not the first but probably the best known of the French Annales school, half a dozen or more of whose works appear to persist in print in English. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:19 am
As far as the actual text, write in plain English that is easy to understand. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
and industrial applicability in Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences Inc, noted by the IPKat here, is (according to a normally reliable source whom the Kat thanks) to be heard by the Supreme Court on Thursday 7 October. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:39 am
The case is Gomez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:22 am
The Enlarged Board held that this question should be answered in the affirmative provided that there was a new technical effect, see also UK decision Activis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ. 444 and German decision X ZR 236/01 Carvedilol II, 19 December 2006. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:12 am
by=brandName&v=&start=0&_=1669115886446. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:28 pm
Focusing first on the Supreme Court's 1986 decision in Bethel School District v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:24 am
(see the IPKat's earlier posts here and here) is now available here in English too. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:44 am
The crux of the debate appears to be whether, in a case where a defendant resides in England, an English court is obliged to hear and determine an action relating to infringement of copyright outside the EU. [read post]
