Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 6261 - 6280 of 6,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2000, 2:00 am
  This change reinforces the concept  recognized by the California Court of appeals in Beehan v Lido Isle Community Association that not all association disputes have to be enforced or resolved by the association. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by admin
” (Attorney General Eric Holder, April 11, 2012) “This was competition on the merits, with Apple providing a superior reading platform on a beautiful 10 inch iPad screen, with color, multi-media, and fixed display, and access to millions of future iPad purchasers. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:16 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Supreme Court’s Rule 23 decisions have had the effect of forcing the plaintiffs’ bar to “re-boot” the architecture of their class action theories.[2] At least one result was the decision three years ago in Tyson Foods v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:16 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Supreme Court’s Rule 23 decisions have had the effect of forcing the plaintiffs’ bar to “re-boot” the architecture of their class action theories.[2] At least one result was the decision three years ago in Tyson Foods v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:28 am by Bexis
  Despite being addressed to Egilman in Massachusetts, however, the subpoena issued from the Superior Court for the State of Alaska. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
MacIsaac of the Ontario Superior Court, during the final seven months of this employment, however, Mr. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
Citing the 1803 landmark case of Marbury v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by Dan Maurer
Later, in an interview with Fox News in 2016, he defended his actions as simply performing his “end of the bargain”—relying on his judgment, as well as the responsibility entrusted to him by his superiors, to execute his mission “in good faith” given the rules and the “context” in which he was serving. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:17 am
. * * * * * A consistent motif of the book is the recurrent myth of “judicial supremacy” in constitutional interpretation — a view that most textbook accounts (and law school casebook accounts) wrongly ascribe to the framing generation and to Marbury v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm by Gordon Firemark
Superior Court, the court of appeal issued a writ of mandate compelling the trial court to grant Touchstone’s motion, holding that the company’s decision not to renew the contract was not a termination, and that Sheridan could not maintain a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy because “a decision not to renew a contract set to expire is not actionable in tort. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:56 pm
On September 24, 2008, the  Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled in Wright v. [read post]