Search for: "Husband v. Wife" Results 6261 - 6280 of 6,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm by familoo
In Lachaux -v- Lachaux [2017] EWHC 385 (Fam) Mr Justice Mostyn considered the guidance in relation to issues between (it transpired) former husband and wife. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:02 am by Kit Case
I never spoke with him, but I reached his wife, Pam, on the phone. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 7:20 am by familoo
Think about Moor J’s remarks in MAP v MFP about a wife who sought an add back in respect of funds spent by her husband on cocaine and prostitutes – well, he said ‘since this was part of H’s flawed character and a spouse must take their partner as they find them, this could not be said to be wanton either & would not be added back’. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
Such hearing shall only be held if:(i) the person is related to the child as described under paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of subdivision three of section four hundred fifty-eight-a of the social services law;(ii) the child has been temporarily removed under this part, or placed pursuant to section one thousand fifty-five of this article, and placed in non-relative foster care;(iii) the relative indicates a willingness to become the foster parent for such child and has not refused previously to be… [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
A quick, non-exclusive list of common examples we frequently encounter are: Facts alleged by the declarant without foundation, i.e. without personal and direct sensory observation of the matter asserted (e.g. my husband smacked the child because I saw the child had a bruise when I picked her up from his house); Conclusory statements subject to less abstract, more specific ways of conveying the information (e.g. he is an abuser, or she is a liar); Legal conclusions that… [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
The lawyer’s wife had brought a habeas corpus application after her husband was detained “with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order”. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm by chief
Finally, for our purposes, ss.198-201 which would abolish a husband's common law duty to maintain his wife and the presumption of advancement are yet to be brought into force. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm by Stephen Wermiel
Section 3 defines the term “marriage” for purposes of federal law as being between a man and a woman, and it defines the term “spouse” as a husband or wife of the opposite sex. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 8:49 am by Russell Knight
Otherwise, a divorce court may estimate that a wife is entitled to the house, while the husband is entitled to the retirement accounts…when the two assets have totally different values. [read post]