Search for: "IN RE GUESS"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 16,480
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2014, 6:06 am
Short phrases can’t be copyrighted, even if they’re distinctively arranged or printed. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 4:08 am
But they’re wrong. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 4:38 pm
With 1,000,000+ comments now in hand, let’s re-calculate. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 5:31 am
They know what they’re doing, and know if they’re breaking the law in the process. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:29 pm
This was particularly infuriating in Word, the new version of which has a cool feature allowing you to pick up a document where you left off — only, the box you have to click to get to your last position in the document appears . . . you guessed it: on the right-hand side of the screen, where you’re most likely to trip the keyboard shortcut default. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm
But re-litigating somewhere close to 50,000 sentences will have gigantic costs. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)* * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)* * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Guess what we found in Huck? [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
I guess we're supposed to assume the appropriateness of a well-deployed "fuck. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 8:14 am
" So I guess if your vision is of building something, you're an architect, but if it's great and wonderful, is it nice? [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:00 am
My guess: an editor complained about using the non-word "non-lawyer" 8 times in a thousand word post so they changed 3 of them to the non-synonym "non-legal". [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:36 pm
And yes, you’ve guessed it. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:55 am
In re ActiveVideo Network, Inc., Serial No. 77967935 (July 9, 2014) [precedential].Applicant did not contest the examining attorney's contention that the term TV is generic for its goods and services, all of which involve streaming images to an electronic device having a screen. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:33 am
For example, I’m guessing that many readers of this post—whether advocates or critics of the idea—could contemplate a 2-year law school degree. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:24 pm
One: …I don’t know what I really think until I write it down, and my guess is that many of you are the same. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 1:32 pm
To encourage these taxpayers to come forward, we’re expanding the eligibility criteria, eliminating a cap on the amount of tax owed to qualify for the program, and doing away with a questionnaire that applicants were required to complete. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:36 am
Well, they’re not over. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:54 am
I guess not. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 3:03 pm
If your little voice will allow you to read it, be open minded, and then apply its principles… Then, guess what? [read post]
