Search for: "J. A. C." Results 6261 - 6280 of 19,475
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  There was one trial, El-Naschie v Macmillan (heard by Sharp J on various dates between 11 November and 2 December 2011) in which judgment is awaited. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 6:17 am by @travelblawg
COURT: Air Marshal Did Not Violate Law By Leaking TSA Information – Former FAM Robert J. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:58 pm by @travelblawg
Marriott’s Content Studio head David Beebe served as Executive Producer and Evan J. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:05 pm
Em sua decisão, o ministro Cezar Peluso relata que, em consulta à internet, constatou que a sentença contra W.S. já transitou em julgado. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
  (c) Would expedition cause prejudice to the other party? [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
"' … {Schumacher [argues] that the request for a civil harassment restraining order "only arises from specific threats that were made to (a) force Petitioner to move out of her home, (b) surveil and stalk Petitioner using 'high tech surveillance,' and (c) threatening to blow Petitioner up with a bomb by posting a video of an explosion superimposed over her speaking. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 3:01 pm
Article 26.044, Code of Criminal Procedure, is amended by amending Subsections (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (l), and (m) and adding Subsections (b-1) and (c-1). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 1:10 pm
Argumentaram, ainda, que já teriam sido impostas outras medidas visando garantir a aplicação da lei penal. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am by Ray Dowd
C–11–02533–(DMR).July 8, 2011.Brett Langdon Gibbs, Steele Hansmeier, PLLC, Mill Valley, CA, for Plaintiff.ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY IN PART; SEVERING DOE DEFENDANTS FROM CASE; AND ORDERING DISMISSAL OF THEIR CLAIMSDONNA M. [read post]
28 May 2012, 2:33 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
The Court of Appeal had upheld Arnold J’s decision at first instance to not grant a Third Party Debt order against the respondent Iraqi bank to the appellant, a judgment creditor of the Republic of Iraq, after the appellant sought enforcement of its judgment against property of Iraq in England. [read post]