Search for: "JOHNSON v. JOHNSON" Results 6261 - 6280 of 11,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2016, 12:29 pm by Emma Durand-Wood
Dangerous drugs law firm Hissey Kientz noted that Johnson & Johnson once offered a plaintiff more than million dollars to drop her baby powder/ovarian cancer lawsuit; described a study that identifies a potential link between PPIs and dementia; and shared details of the FDA’s long-overdue update to fluoroquinolone (FLQ) warning labels. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:29 pm by Emma Durand-Wood
Dangerous drugs law firm Hissey Kientz noted that Johnson & Johnson once offered a plaintiff more than million dollars to drop her baby powder/ovarian cancer lawsuit; described a study that identifies a potential link between PPIs and dementia; and shared details of the FDA’s long-overdue update to fluoroquinolone (FLQ) warning labels. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:25 am by Robert S. Gilmore
All employees under covered contracts must be fully vaccinated by Jan. 18, 2022, meaning two weeks after receiving the second dose of either the Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine or the single dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:28 am by WSLL
Brian Darnell, D.O., and Johnson County Hospital District. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:10 am by Joe Consumer
According to a report from the Center for Justice & Democracy, ALEC's civil justice priorities deal with drug industry liability in the wake of Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:17 am by Richard J. Webb
[Image: Band-Aid brand adhesive bandage manufactured by Johnson & Johnson, by Svetlana Miljkovic, June 20, 2006] [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:54 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Recent Case Illustrates How a Recreational Use Statute May Bar Recovery In the case, Woody v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
-Disclosure Dedication Rule – subject matter disclosed but not claimed is dedicated to the public and cannot be recaptured under the DOE (Johnson & Johnson Assocs. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
That would make mass torts less massive and all litigation easier to defend.And, of course, if the law barred DTC advertising for two years, we could explain to juries that the law requires not just FDA approval of a new drug, but also an intentionally slow introduction to the market to help protect public safety, even if that slow introduction reduces corporate profits.So we're of two minds on this issue.But we can't stop there: Remember the decision in West Virginia ex rel… [read post]