Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 6261 - 6280 of 7,891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm by Lawrence Solum
[T]he owner's duty, as in other similar situations, to provide against resulting injuries is a function of three variables: (1) The probability that she will break away; (2) the gravity of the resulting injury, if she does; (3) the burden of adequate precautions. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:30 am by Hance Haney
Network neutrality proponents didn’t like that, so by a 3-2 vote along partisan lines the FCC issued a Notice of Inquiry to consider reclassifying broadband as a “telecommunications” service under Title II and then forbearing from enforcing most of Title II’s requirements. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
As the Jackson 5 put it: “A-B-C is easy as 1-2-3. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:10 am by Kelly
Tabari (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Precedential No. 27: Finding computer software and services related, TTAB affirms 2(d) ACTIVECARE refusal (TTABlog) [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
  (3) Alternatively liability failed because all of the defendants weren't negligent. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:20 am
This article discusses three main effects: 1) the raced construction of the lawyer-hero; 2) the denial or displacement of the law’s role in constructing race and race-based discrimination; and 3) the suppression or revision of politics and political history. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 8:59 am by Anthony Lake
Representative Rahm Emanuel in exchange for a $2 million grant to a school in Emanuel’s district. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
Section 12(3) of the Act was interpreted by the House of Lords in Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee ([2004] UKHL 44) to mean that, in order to obtain an interim injunction, the claimant must ordinarily show (at least) that his claim is more likely than not to succeed at trial. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Isabel McArdle
She considered the essence of the right to be “(1) authorisation by judicial officer and (2) regular review” (Paragraph 59). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:40 am by Lawrence Solum
American dual sovereignty is implied in various provisions that refer to the separate states, but most encapsulated as a constitutional directive in the Tenth Amendment - which establishes that the Constitution (1) delegates some powers to the federal government, (2) prohibits some to the states, and (3) reserves powers that fit in neither of these two sets to the states (or perhaps the people). [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 4:50 pm by law shucks
Sullivan & Cromwell and Cravath were 1-2, and they are traditionally powerhouses in strategic M&A. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Article 27(1) TRIPS stipulates that, subject to the provisions of its paragraphs 2 and 3, patents shall be available for any inventions, whether products or processes, in all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve an inventive step and are capable of industrial application. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:19 am by Lawrence Taylor
I identified the driver using his/her CaliforniaDriver's License as John Doe 00-00-00. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:56 pm by John Culhane
John Culhane, Professor of Law, Widener University, I would not want to be a student sitting in your class where I’d be fed an assortment of lies served up by a biased, or should I say prejudice, bigot! [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:51 pm by Nathan
  Their argument is more along the lines of (1) the feds get to determine policy of how and when the feds enforce their own laws; (2) Arizona isn’t telling the feds what to do, but it’s going to be enforcing the same laws more thoroughly; so (3) Arizona is messing with the feds’ policy. [read post]