Search for: "Laws v. State" Results 6261 - 6280 of 155,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 4:23 am by tracey
NS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Amnesty International Ltd and others intervening); ME and others v Refugee Applications Comr and another (Amnesty International Ltd and others intervening); (Joined Cases C-411/10 and C-493/10);  [2011] WLR (D)  388 “European Union law precluded the application of a conclusive presumption that the member state responsible for examining an asylum claim pursuant to Council… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:05 am by Brandon W. Barnett
  Before Bryant, Crawford basically stated that statements made during interrogations qualified as testimonial. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 1:28 am
Dobosh, Jr., Coercion in the Ranks: the Establishment Clause Implications of Chaplain-Led Prayers at Mandatory Army Events, 2006 Wisconsin Law Review 1493-1562 (2006).Charles Flores, Marital Jam Sessions on Trial: Ecclesiastical Abstention and Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 6:41 am
“Because the change in law substantially altered the State’s incentive to contest Bies’s mental capacity, applying preclusion would not advance the equitable administration of the law. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 7:32 am by Amy Howe
The denial of review in New York State Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm by Eric Goldman
Anyone who thinks the OEC’s flags were censorship should be even more livid about the Florida and Texas laws. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Francisco Macías
:  GPO, United States Commission of Civil Rights, 1970. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:15 pm by Alfred Brophy
 Law professors -- particularly those at Alabama and Georgia -- will be particularly interested in knowing that our former colleague John Neiman, who's now Alabama Solicitor General, argued the case for Thomas (the state of Alabama). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:53 am by Mark Cooke, ACLU of Washington
Again relying on the state constitution, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously ruled (in York v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:45 pm by Howard Bashman
“Senate panel airs fallout from Supreme Court abortion decision; Democrats describe ‘chaos’ of legal decisions and state laws in the aftermath of last year’s ruling that reversed Roe v. [read post]