Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 6261 - 6280 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2012, 7:23 am by John Day
I don't have much information about NECC and quite frankly it doesn't appear much is known about it, but (a) it has taken its website down; (b) it is not answering its phone; and (c) it has surrendered its license to the state authorities in Massachusetts. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:23 pm by Harry Graver
§973(b)(2)(A)(ii)’s so-called “dual-officeholder ban. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 7:25 am by Howard Knopf
James Moore (Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages, CPC): Madam Speaker, I was not really prepared to discuss this question from my Bloc Québécois colleague, but we are here to discuss the important matter of the firearms registry. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:14 pm by Eric Turkewitz
Nor does it matter if the advertisements are well-written; it is the concept of the directed ad that I find abhorrent. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 12:51 pm by Scott Gearity
A: Tell us who they are, we'll give them a call. 5:09 Q: When will Schedule B go away? [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 11:31 am
  The terminology doesn't matter for its own sake, but it is important to be clear about the meaning of the phrase when discussing path dependency. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:47 am
But under the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine, the legislature can’t just ban a vast range of political threats and let prosecutorial discretion take care of the matter. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 4:49 am
Falsely equating "equitable" with "injunctive," such plaintiffs argue for certification under a different section of the class action rule (Rule 23(b)(2)), for you lawyers) that doesn't expressly require common issues to predominate. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Alan Neff
” Citing Bush, Roberts acknowledged that, while federal courts should defer to state courts on matters of state constitutional interpretation, there are “outer bounds” when federal courts may need to police such rulings when they implicate the Elections Clause. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:22 am by Russell Knight
” In re Estate of Ersch, 195 NE 2d 149 – Ill: Supreme Court 1963 What If I Can’t Get A Public Document Into Evidence? [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:50 pm by Steve Bainbridge
 I agree that most of them don't matter if, for example, the question is whether you are a resident for the purpose of the city income tax. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Of course, that might not matter to the Chief Justice, who isn’t much worried if a few lawyers misunderstand at first, and are thus unpersuaded. [read post]