Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2015, 6:36 am
The United States supported the report’s recommendations. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:22 pm
While the North Carolina Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
" As the Supreme Court of the United States recognized in Carey [v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm
’ Convergence facts, figures and trends (IPKat) 100 domains on movie and music industry website blocking wishlist (TorrentFreak) Design infringement in the UK: official guidance (Class 99) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC rejects narrow view of analogous arts test: Innovention Toys vs. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm
Maybe the End of Times, for False Marking Suits Under the America Invents Act, "Only the United States may sue for statutory damages. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:00 pm
McMahon (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Google sued again for trade mark infringement in relation to AdWords program: Soaring Helmet v Leatherup.com (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Psystar – Psystar owes Apple $75,000 while Apple moves to lift stay in dispute over unauthorised Mac clones (Ars Technica) [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) District Court E D Michigan: Gripe site prevails in domain cybersquatting case: Career Agents Network, Inc v careeragentsnetwork.biz (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google - Google dismisses some claims and gets some attorneys’ fees: Jurin v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) District Court E D Michigan: Gripe site prevails in domain cybersquatting case: Career Agents Network, Inc v careeragentsnetwork.biz (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google - Google dismisses some claims and gets some attorneys’ fees: Jurin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:33 am
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS Following the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
Background of trademark law Passed by Congress in 1946, the Lanham Act is the source of all Federal trademark law in the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 7:47 am
The panel stated that the parties never intended to carry on as co-owners of a business for profit and that nClosures net gain of $33.75 per Rhino Elite unit from Block did not constitute a profit-sharing agreement between the companies. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
: (MaRS),Copyright and trade mark trolls? [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
While opponents of marriage for same-sex couples almost always throw quotation marks around the word when they use it in their written arguments in these cases, the quotation marks are not justified as a matter of law. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 1:02 am
Read the full article here USPTO launches Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Center The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has introduced the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) Center in an open beta phase, offering a new platform for filing notices of opposition. [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 7:59 am
President Trump is refocusing government operations to their core mission—serving the citizens of the United States. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
This symposium explores these and other issues.Keynote Lecture: James V Feinerman, Associate Dean for Transnational Programs, Co-Director, Georgetown Law Asia, and James M. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:13 am
Fortunately for Apple, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, while aware of what the media reported, will (have to) rule on a different basis.I don't disagree with Apple philosophically. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:21 am
This Kat was so reminded in revisiting the 2013 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Already LLC dba Yums v. [read post]
