Search for: "Power-One, Inc." Results 6261 - 6280 of 11,305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2020, 10:14 am by Chris Castle
 And they get away with it because of their monopoly power, which leaves one choice most artists won’t make, which is to sue them like Maria has. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, movant's application is timely (see Nor star Apartments, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am by Steve Bainbridge
” [8] The claim is direct, not derivative,  because “where a shareholder has been denied one of the most critical rights he or she possesses—the right to a fully informed vote—the harm suffered is almost always an individual, not corporate, harm. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
One was the change in the basic premise of the role of trust in corporate governance from one that was  invested in trust of the individual--especially officers and directors  to one that became increasingly trusting of systems of assessments of the trustworthiness of those key governance actors. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
Kavanaugh has written two defamation opinions and one opinion addressing speech that incites unlawful action. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:05 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
  I was recently interviewed by the Quebec legal site Droit Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:40 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Doctrine Under Delaware Law Similarly, in Delaware, there is a line of case law emanating from Katz v Plant Indus., Inc. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
— American Needle, Inc., a maker of sports hats, uniforms and other apparel. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
Although the consent requirement in the trust instrument supposedly limited the trustee’s discretion, it did not completely deprive the trustee of discretion because the co-beneficiary, who was also trustee, held the power to modify the terms of the trust. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
Although the consent requirement in the trust instrument supposedly limited the trustee’s discretion, it did not completely deprive the trustee of discretion because the co-beneficiary, who was also trustee, held the power to modify the terms of the trust. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:07 am
  If it is exclusive, there's at least dicta in a Delaware case, In re Valley Media, Inc., that it is assignable. [read post]