Search for: "Roll v. Roll"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 6,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2020, 4:57 pm
(See Moore v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
This devolution jurisdiction was first exercised by the Privy Council to rule on allegations of Convention rights violations by the prosecution in both solemn procedure (Montgomery v HMA 2001 SC (PC) 1, 19 October 2000) and summary criminal procedure (Brown v Stott 2001 SC (PC) 43, 5 December 2000). [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm
Apart from suggesting that a corporate lawyer, with no experience of policing, let alone the more difficult and complex aspects of frontline operational policing, take over the top job at Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) – Ms May MP is on a roll with her latest stunt on providing guidelines to the judges. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
Under Roe, state laws banning or restrictively regulating abortion were invalid.After two decades of backlash and maneuvering by the anti-abortion movement (including violence against clinics and providers), the Court revisited Roe in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Recruitment v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 10:04 pm
Palmer v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
We have also learned that Jim Beck has a keen knowledge of The Rolling Stones. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 4:15 am
In an example provided by LexisNexis, a Georgia case, Durrah v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:03 pm
This is why you should roll your eyes whenever a party to a collective agreement attempts to demonize the other for not agreeing to interest arbitration. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:29 am
Imagine little Joe v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm
Leroy V, Inc. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am
Syndicate, The (West Springfield, MA) B&V Cab, Inc. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
It does this in a few different ways – some of which appear to be effective immediately, and some of which will roll out over time. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Similarly, Kennedy’s willingness to join with former Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and David Souter in protecting women’s right to choose in the 1992 Casey decision was important, to put it mildly.Even so, there were more than a few items on the other side of the ledger, including Kennedy’s cowardly vote in Bush v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:30 am
This is partly because Strasbourg’s guidance is not very clear [our interview took place before the ECHR’s recent decision in Firth & Ors v UK (App No 47784/09)] and also because our sentencing legislation is such a minefield. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 7:17 am
The Biden Administration rolled out policy changes that are continuing to take shape through executive orders, legislative efforts, agency rulemaking, and enforcement litigation. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:46 am
The decline has been even steeper in federal district courts.Cases like Florida v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:01 am
Public Service v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
LET us go then, you and I,When the evening is spread out against the skyLike a patient etherized upon a table;Let us go, through certain half-deserted streets,The muttering retreats Of restless nights in one-night cheap hotelsAnd sawdust restaurants with oyster-shells:Streets that follow like a tedious argumentOf insidious intentTo lead you to an overwhelming question…. [read blog]
28 May 2020, 2:05 am
One Committee member (Ruth Edwards M.P.) responded that she did not think that any element of the conspiracy theory could be categorised as ‘harmless’, because “it is threatening public confidence in the 5G roll-out” — a proposition with which the DCMS Minister Caroline Dinenage agreed. [read post]
