Search for: "State v. Burden" Results 6261 - 6280 of 22,159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2008, 6:59 pm
The latest judgment against protectionist state wine laws came in a Michigan Court on September 30 in the case of Siesta Village Market v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:45 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In the previous post on this topic, we had discussed a portion of the landmark case of Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:10 pm by Sandra C. Fava
 Well, in the recent unpublished decision of Hartelust v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am by Charlie French (Bristows)
Although the Court of Appeal stated in Ocado v AutoStore that the interest of the general public usually arises after a decision is rendered, the position was different in this case as it might be too late for Nicoventures to use the information in the EPO proceedings if access was not granted immediately. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by SJM
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by SJM
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
Once this is done, the employer is charged with the burden of producing a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse employment decision. [read post]