Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 13,258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 1:02 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).During oral arguments in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm
Naqvi v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
Tribal court jurisdiction over non-Indian entities is limited already, but the test announced in Montana v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 3:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
And contrary to some commentators, the 1790 criminal piracy statute at issue in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
United States, et al. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:20 pm
” Lewis v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 7:01 am
In another case, eight states, the City of New York, and three land trusts have sued the utilities that are the five largest carbon dioxide largest emitters in the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
Coffey v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm
Disney filed a lawsuit in a California Federal Court, Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
"To establish standing under SEQRA", said the court, "a petitioner must show (1) an environmental injury that is in some way different from that of the public at large, and (2) that the alleged injury falls within the zone of interests sought to be protected or promoted by SEQRA," citing Matter of Tuxedo Land Trust, Inc. v Town Bd. of Town of Tuxedo, 112 AD3d 726 and other decisions. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:20 am
Support for this obscure proposition is found in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:01 am
The defendants in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 10:55 am
(Ketchum v. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 10:32 am
People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:22 am
" That derives from Ford v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 9:29 am
In Dudek v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
"To establish standing under SEQRA", said the court, "a petitioner must show (1) an environmental injury that is in some way different from that of the public at large, and (2) that the alleged injury falls within the zone of interests sought to be protected or promoted by SEQRA," citing Matter of Tuxedo Land Trust, Inc. v Town Bd. of Town of Tuxedo, 112 AD3d 726 and other decisions. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 8:01 am
And since RFRA contains an express right of action with an express provision for "appropriate relief," the initial three-judge panel faithfully applied that statute in holding the plaintiffs could sue the federal government for damages over the religiously-motivated no-fly determination.Writing for the pro-en banc judges, Judge Jacobs (joined by Judges Cabranes and Sullivan) writes that a comparable religious discrimination statute, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Police say staff 97 per cent fully vaccinatedThe Supreme Court will take up the most important abortion case in 30 years as it considers a state's request to overturn Roe v. [read post]
