Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 28,991
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2009, 9:58 am
Thank you to those who were able to join us live for today's teleconference. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:02 pm
While we review transcripts for a living, they listen to witnesses for a living. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Herrick v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
” In 1972, in Apodaca v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 12:42 pm
Here's the letter:In light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Medellin v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:18 pm
Smith v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
" * The Retirement and Social Security Law defines an "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact" [See Matter of Kenny v DiNapoli, 11 NY3d 873] ** Petitioner testified that, as part of his standard duties as a firefighter, he engaged in training exercises at the training center several times a year that included live-fire search and rescue operation drills where controlled fires were set, reducing visibility to zero. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
" * The Retirement and Social Security Law defines an "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact" [See Matter of Kenny v DiNapoli, 11 NY3d 873] ** Petitioner testified that, as part of his standard duties as a firefighter, he engaged in training exercises at the training center several times a year that included live-fire search and rescue operation drills where controlled fires were set, reducing visibility to zero. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court issued an opinion, Chaidez v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 5:00 am
In the case of Sycalik v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am
Bank v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:38 pm
(Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:01 am
Miller v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Amaral v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am
United States Postal Service, in which they will consider whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
Less certain is how couples living in the remaining 37 states will fare. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:58 am
In People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:58 am
In People v. [read post]
