Search for: "State v. South"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 10,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm
These cases followed the framework Chief Justice Roberts established in South Bay Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:42 pm
On August 14, 1930, the South Carolina Supreme Court filed three similar cases involving a dead something-or-other in a bottle: Tate v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 8:39 pm
FHL’s claim was based on JOAs and PCAs signed in 2006 between PEL and the President of Pakistan, which governed oil exploration and production in the Badin South and Badin North Blocks. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Lockett v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:40 am
The first opinion was in Turner v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:48 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
Yahli Shereshevsky (Michigan/Hebrew) - Back in The Game: The Reengagement of States in International Humanitarian Law Making Commentator – Moshe Hirsch (Hebrew) 11:00-12:30 Parallel Sessions Panel IV – Legal Responses to Violence Chair – Guy Harpaz (Hebrew) Asli Ozcelik-Olcay (Glasgow), The Role of International Law in Peace Negotiations: Certainty, legitimacy, malleability Shiri Krebs (Deakin) – When More… [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:53 am
In UMG v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 7:21 am
Relying on its decision in State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 12:45 pm
"A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study on Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge and Access to Services of Arab and Kurdish Syrian Refugee Young Women Living in an Urban Setting in Lebanon," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 18 (Sept. 2021) [open access] - Authors (3) = Germany Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 12:18 pm
BNC Bancorp v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
This development comes on the heels of South Dakota repealing the same transaction threshold earlier this year – that threshold was acknowledged in Wayfair[4] as one of the benchmarks to determine if a remote seller availed itself of the substantial privilege of carrying on business in a state so as to justify an obligation to remit the tax. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:23 am
East West, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
No. 90848, 2008-Ohio-5094 (no-law argument) State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Army Corps of EngineersDocket: 10-1059Issue(s): The court of appeals held in this case that land transfers by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to the State of South Dakota pursuant to the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 did not violate §§ 605(b)(3) and (c)(1)(B) of that Act because they did not include lands within the “external boundaries” of the Yankton Sioux Reservation. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:55 am
Supreme Court ruling in Frye v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 11:52 pm
I note that almost all states have abolished it with Hawaii, Illinois, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota and Utah being the exceptions. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
(Pavlov v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:06 am
U.S. v. [read post]
