Search for: "Thomas v. State"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 13,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2020, 8:34 am
The US Supreme Court held Monday in Banister v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:15 am
The complaint (full text) in Satawa v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:58 am
In Best Wood Judge Firewood and Tree Service v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 8:17 am
Supreme Court issued an opinion in T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:21 am
Earlier today, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Kasten v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 7:55 pm
Why it matters: After overturning Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 2:50 pm
In a 5 to 4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled on the controversial Ricci v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:51 pm
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Thomas D. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:28 pm
The short answer: On a heavily textualist analysis, Justice Thomas, writing for the majority (Breyer and Stevens dissenting), holds that the tax exemption is available only for sales after plan confirmation. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Arkinson, in which a unanimous SCOTUS assured us that if a bankruptcy court is confronted with a state law issue masquerading as a “core” issue—such as, in this case, a fraudulent transfer lawsuit—that invokes the specter of Stern v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:46 pm
 Justice Thomas more or less took Gura’s position in his dissent in Saenz v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:58 am
The Threat to Agency Enforcement Power A second case, SEC v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:57 am
But Jefferson himself encouraged at least one governor from his party, Thomas McKean of Pennsylvania, to bring state criminal libel prosecutions against Jefferson’s critics in the Federalist press. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
And yes, I know your three word response will be "Plessy v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:43 pm
Industrial Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 3:56 am
Chang alleges that Thomas Cartelli, Esq. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:37 pm
It is safe to conclude that the silent Justice Clarence Thomas shares this view of the case, based on Thomas’ past votes in cases raising similar issues. [read post]
