Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 6261 - 6280 of 21,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2013, 7:36 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
As the country's attention turns to next week's oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the Prop 8 case and the ACLU's challenge to DOMA in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:36 am by Peter Klose
(i) For purposes of this contract, the term “Institutional Lender” shall mean any bank, savings bank, private banker, trust company, savings and loan association, credit union or similar banking institution whether organized under the laws of this state, the United States or any other state, foreign banking corporation licensed by the Superintendent of Banks of New York or regulated by the Comptroller of the Currency to transact business in New York… [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:34 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
PTO refused registration pursuant to Section 2(e)(1) of the United States Trademark Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
In the absence of actual harm, privacy cases are hardly worth pursuing http://t.co/6RYcmFS01Q -> United States: Nudity, Privacy and the Prostitute – Susan Brenner http://t.co/8r3oTanQVT -> Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson http://t.co/qHm27iucpC -> Web Site Accessibility Standards in Ontario http://t.co/5GkvGyebgZ -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2015-05-23: Computer… [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm by Samuel Bray
Professor Harrison's work was recently highlighted by Professor Amanda Frost at SCOTUSBlog as one side of a debate critical to United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am by Rosalind English
The Queen on the application of Naik v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1546 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker  from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful,  and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 4:06 pm by Jim Singer
 In the John Wiley and Sons case, the Court considered whether copyrighted goods manufactured outside of the United States are subject to the first sale doctrine, and it concluded that the answer was “no. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:12 am
The latter forms of backsliding entail the debilitation of democratic institutions from within....Beginning in 2017, political scientists identified the United States under President Donald Trump as being in danger of democratic backsliding. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Cl. 2, Amendments IX, X[1]·      German Basic Law, arts.20-25; 31[2]·      Constitution of South Africa, arts. 1, 2, 39, 146-150[3]·      Indiana Code 1-1-2-1[4]·      Hierarchy of Law in Georgia[5]__________Hierarchy of Law in the United StatesConstitution of the United StatesArticle, § 1All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a… [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:00 pm
Six days later, Contec sued CTDI for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (“the New York action”). [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses McWilliams v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting and influential passage, most recently quoted by Judge Posner in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:28 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch On Patently-O, our primary focus is patent law, but sometimes we remember that the “Patent Office” is actually the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]