Search for: "Andrews v. Andrews" Results 6281 - 6300 of 7,460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2025, 5:42 am by Scott Bomboy
For now, the Ogles amendment will face the same challenging path as other amendments outlined under the Constitution’s Article V process. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 12:16 am by Frank Cranmer
Andrew Selous (South Bedfordshire, Con): “The National Church Institutions have no current plans to do so”. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Hilton discussed the differences between the DSM-IV and DSM-V with respect to PTSD cases, and particularly how the DSM-V diagnostic criteria are more permissive than past versions of the DSM. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:12 am by Chester Brown
He also offers a fresh perspective on the debate most recently revisited by Jack Goldsmith and Eric Posner, Andrew Guzman, and Mary Ellen O’Connell, arguing that it is more productive to ask what decision-makers should do about law, than what law requires of decision-makers (p. 296). [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
Rev. 480 (1990), has been cited for the proposition that the brief that Dawn Johnsen wrote in Webster v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Andrew Jackson killed the national bank that McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 11:05 pm
 A similar story was recently told before Mrs Justice Slade in the Queens Bench Division in Arthur J Gallagher Services and others v Skriptchenko and Others [2016] EWHC 603. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Indeed, several scholars have argued that the latter is extremely unlikely (see, for example, Andrew Rehfeld, David Broockman and Christopher Skovron, Christopher Achen and Larry Bartels), if not impossible. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm by Victoria Kwan
Without independence, there is no Brown v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 1:55 pm by John Floyd
The Supreme Court effectively redefined the concept in 1922 in United States v. [read post]