Search for: "B. R." Results 6281 - 6300 of 55,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2019, 10:06 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Second Circuit observed that Under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention, a court is not bound to order the repatriation of a child if “[t]here is a grave risk that his or her return would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:02 pm by Josh Blackman
Judge Elrod first focuses on Part III-B, which established the predicate for the saving construction: In Part III-B, again joined by no other Justice, Chief Justice Roberts concluded that because the individual mandate found no constitutional footing in the Interstate Commerce or Necessary and Proper Clauses, the Supreme Court was obligated to consider the federal government's argument that, as an exercise in constitutional avoidance, the mandate could be read not as a command… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
A story in the newspapers this morning has made me think once again about some of the weaknesses in Irish law relating to damages for data protection infringements. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:47 pm by Ralf Michaels
Speakers: Nieve Rubaja (Argentina), Luciana B. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
However, applications under sub-Rules 7-9(2)(b) to (e) are not so restricted, and consideration may be had of other appropriate evidence. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 10:52 pm by Ralf Michaels
Onyoja Momoh, The interpretation and application of Article 13(1) b) of the Hague Child Abduction Convention in cases involving domestic violence: Revisiting X v Latvia and the principle of “effective examination” A key interpretation and application issue in the scheme of Article 13(1) b) of the Hague Child Abduction Convention is whether judges should investigate first the merits of the defence before considering whether protective measures are adequate or whether… [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
Risky and uncertain privilege and work-product concerns arise when a company designates an in-house attorney to serve as a FRCP 30(b)(6) deposition witness. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
Risky and uncertain privilege and work-product concerns arise when a company designates an in-house attorney to serve as a FRCP 30(b)(6) deposition witness. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
B.16.In essence, the appellants claim the right to live in Canada, but to be free from the obligations and language of any laws they do not choose to accept. [read post]