Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 31,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Grant v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 7:12 am
Katz v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 10:03 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:04 am
MUNZO V. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 10:03 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
In its decision today, the Court effectively overruled Stenberg's "undue burden" test for facial challenges to abortion-restriction statues (see pages 36-37 of the opinion). [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 11:40 am
In City of Jacksonville v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
” State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 5:23 am
But the new decision (Matthews v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:57 am
The bill seeks to return age discrimination plaintiffs to the standard the Senators believe they were subject to prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gross v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Quill Corporation v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:50 am
On July 30th, the Michigan Supreme Court published the opinion of Chief Justice Young, joined by Justices Markman, Mary Beth Kelly and Zahra, in Douglas v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:58 am
Hussmann of the Southern District of Indiana has denied a Motion to Quash Subpoena filed by Defendant Doe No. 2 in First Time Video v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:16 am
One brief (but significant) point that thus far has gone largely unnoticed in the wide coverage of yesterday’s speech by Attorney General Eric Holder is his invocation of the Supreme Court’s Mathews v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm
”Yums further argues that Nike failed to carry its “heavy burden” of showing mootness, and notes that the lower court’s decision is inconsistent with “the strong federal policy favoring the full and free use of ideas in the public domain,” citing to Lear, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
” Failing that policing burden, Pixels becomes a direct counterfeiter. [read post]
9 May 2013, 6:34 pm
The petition of the day is: Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:47 am
Monday's Supreme Court decision in Enquist v. [read post]
