Search for: "CHANCE v. STATE"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 12,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2014, 4:59 am
Who would require a cop to take the chance? [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:16 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:20 am
- And that Dogge was able to copy the work as Teller had not stated that the trick was a copyrighted work. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
- And that Dogge was able to copy the work as Teller had not stated that the trick was a copyrighted work. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 2:24 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 11:11 am
Yunker v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm
Arguing for the agents in Wood v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
As this Court made very clear in State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:30 pm
The consolidated cases are Sebelius v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:53 am
But now the Supreme Court will have a chance to face the question squarely, in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
Edith Wilmans of Dallas—to hear the case of Johnson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 7:21 pm
Or my all time favorite upset: when Jimmy V’s NCSU team made an amazing dunk at the buzzer to edge out Houston (yes, with Hakeem Olajuwon and Clyde Drexler) in the 1983 finals? [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:24 am
In January, it was a seven-year long trade mark battle between L’Oréal v eBay before the UK courts (and the CJEU) that bit the dust. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 8:03 am
Most states have similar laws for accessing documents on the state and local levels. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm
Carrion v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 10:58 am
Gardner v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:24 am
As a result, exact but miniaturised reproductions of artistic works [this was the 1995 Tidy v Trustees of the Natural History Museum case] or colour variations between an original artwork and a reproduction of it [this is the 1999 Pasterfield v Denham decision] may be considered not to infringe the author’s right of integrity.What do readers think of differences in the scope of moral right protection? [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:02 am
N.J. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
The employee sued Nationwide for sex and pregnancy discrimination under Title VII and state law. [read post]
