Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2012, 1:51 pm
The cashier does not [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The district court disposed of challenges on the ground that the defendants enjoyed various kinds of immunity and did not reach constitutional issues. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
(Schuette v Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, April 22, 2014, to be reported at 97 EPD ¶45,054) Initiative prompted by 2003 Supreme Court ruling. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am
The due process clause of the 14th Amendment limits where defendants can be sued. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:36 pm
March 20, 2024. 12-1:00 pm ET (New York); 4-5:00 pm GMT (Dakar); 5-6:00 pm CET (Paris). [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 8:22 pm
(More defendants and lots of new cases to go around for everyone.) [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:17 am
After almost 20 years of litigation, including appearances before the California Supreme Court and the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:59 am
"I believe the most significant contributing factor is that FDA is part of HHS (Health and Human Services) and does not have the independent ability to bring its own enforcement actions in federal court," explains Kitchens. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:16 am
The focus of this write-up is a case note on a very recent decision of the Nigerian Court of Appeal that declined to enforce an exclusive English choice of court agreement.[1] In this case the 1st claimant/respondent was an insured party while the defendant/appellant was the insurer of the claimant/respondent. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 7:19 am
UCLA (Does the offense stink?) [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Rather, the Sixth Circuit’s decision binds only federal courts in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee.13 Accordingly, California public agencies remain free to argue that that the decision was wrongly decided because (1) chalking does not constitute a “search” and (2) chalking is reasonable as a matter of law even if it constitutes a search. 1. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:29 am
Authors may submit one (1) sole and one (1) joint authored paper. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 10:03 am
Authors may submit one (1) sole and one (1) joint authored paper. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm
”In Chapter 1 Emerson starts his search in Germany. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
In 2009, when TG was 20 and in need of housing assistance, following contact from TG's solicitors, Lambeth decided he was not a 'former relevant child' under section 23C(1) Children Act 1989 and that he was therefore not owed the continuing duties. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
In 2009, when TG was 20 and in need of housing assistance, following contact from TG's solicitors, Lambeth decided he was not a 'former relevant child' under section 23C(1) Children Act 1989 and that he was therefore not owed the continuing duties. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Once the defendant establishes his right to summary judgment as a matter of law, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to present evidence raising a genuine issue of material fact. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:48 am
Code § 20-4-20(b) limits to a spouse; a former spouse; persons who have a child in common; and a male and female who are cohabiting or formerly have cohabited. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
The PCC has not made any new adjudications during its transition period, but there are several resolved cases to report: Mr Philip Bovey v The Independent, Clause 12, 26/03/2012; Mr Nic Bullough v Southern Daily Echo, Clause 1, 23/03/2012; Mr Freddie Wright v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/03/2012; Dr John Glasspool v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/03/2012; The Scottish Refugee Council v Scottish Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/03/2012; Ms Lucy Buckingham v Southport… [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 6:32 am
Third, Fihn contends that, while the TPNW does not raise the safeguards requirements, “this treaty does not lower the standard of safeguards from the NPT. [read post]
