Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Jan. 20, 2012), the court affirmed the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment against the defendants Special Situations Fund II, QP, L.P. and Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
Plaintiff Steven Simkin (husband) and defendant Laura Blank (wife) married in 1973 and had two children. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:38 pm
The indictment does not give any indication how the feds pierced the veil of the technological tools used to shield the operation from being tracked, but the document is filled with evidence gathered from e-mail communications that took place between 2007 and 2009, while the defendants were using Hushmail. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:47 am
To show infringement of the right of publicity, a plaintiff must plead and prove: (1) Validity - That plaintiff owns an enforceable right in the identity or persona of a human being; and (2) Infringement (a) That defendant, without permission, has used some aspect of identity or persona in such a way that plaintiff is identifiable from defendant’s use; and (b) That defendant’s use is likely to cause damage to the commercial value of that persona. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:47 am
To show infringement of the right of publicity, a plaintiff must plead and prove: (1) Validity - That plaintiff owns an enforceable right in the identity or persona of a human being; and (2) Infringement (a) That defendant, without permission, has used some aspect of identity or persona in such a way that plaintiff is identifiable from defendant’s use; and (b) That defendant’s use is likely to cause damage to the commercial value of that persona. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:47 am
To show infringement of the right of publicity, a plaintiff must plead and prove: (1) Validity - That plaintiff owns an enforceable right in the identity or persona of a human being; and (2) Infringement (a) That defendant, without permission, has used some aspect of identity or persona in such a way that plaintiff is identifiable from defendant’s use; and (b) That defendant’s use is likely to cause damage to the commercial value of that persona. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
" Id. at 20-21. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:41 am
Approved as amended by full House 1/4/12. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
How is it that this little, under 20-page article became incredibly influential? [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Some of the tests said that over 20 "sample attempts" were made for one subject test. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:37 am
The Sentencing Commission suggested reducing the ratio to 5-1 in 1997, and 20-1 five years later, but Congress ignored it and kept the laws intact. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm
Brighton Conference begins The Brighton Conference on European Court of Human Rights reform, due to take place on 18-20 April, begins on Wednesday. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 11:17 pm
John Does 1-20 are management personnel and/or owners who made relevant decisions in this case with regard to the plaintiff’s transaction as well as the charging of documentary fee on any and all transactions within the past six years. 4. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:22 pm
The crux of the broader interest in the case has been recent applications of the CFAA criminalizing violations of website terms of use and employer restrictions on employee computer uses, stemming in particular from what the statute’s term “exceeds authorized access” does and does not mean. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:57 pm
” Appellee’s Br. 20. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
They might even hire their own law firm to defend themselves against….themselves. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:31 am
Does 1-55, No. 11 C 2798, Slip Op. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:03 am
"Plaintiff alleges that, on December 7, 2007, he was assaulted in the lobby of a building (the Building), located at 1745 Caton Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, in which he was a tenant and that he hired defendant to represent him in prosecuting his claim (the Underlying Claim) (complaint, 1'8 1, 4 ) . [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
A substantially similar version of this article was initially published in Issue No. 1 2012 of the Business Law News of the California State Bar. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 11:13 am
The study concluded that life with parole and life without parole cases took 2 to 2 1/2 years, respectively. [read post]
