Search for: "Doe v. Smith"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 7,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 11:35 am
It held that the lease does not require an "independent" certified public accountant to determine the operating expenses and that the landlord complied with the lease provisions by employing its internal certified public accountant to determine the operating expenses. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
Further, since Officer Smith's opinion does not fit into any legally recognized exception to this rule, his opinion is inadmissible. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:34 pm
Smith & Nephew Pty Ltd v Wake Forest University Health Sciences [2009] FCAFC 142 [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
Although this may not cause a considerable impact on professional sports leagues and teams if the player is a substitute who does not play, consider if the situation arose in the case of a marquee player. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:56 am
Smith, Assistant Attorney General.Facts/Discussion: Bromley killed Jason Voss with a shotgun in 2007. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:34 am
Berghuis v Smith, Supreme Court No. 08-1402. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
A careful analysis of the derivatives-related scandals mentioned above show that the source of the problem does not merely emerge from the use of the derivatives but instead, from either a failure to properly use such instruments, or from other externalities such as poor corporate governance mechanisms. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
A careful analysis of the derivatives-related scandals mentioned above show that the source of the problem does not merely emerge from the use of the derivatives but instead, from either a failure to properly use such instruments, or from other externalities such as poor corporate governance mechanisms. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:23 am
In Richard v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
October 31, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35, 41 (1988) (holding that “a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turns over to third parties” (quoting Smith v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Smith, 771 N.W.2d 151, 155 (Neb. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
And Judge Smith confines his discussion of this central case to a single footnote.For good reason, since his attempts to distinguish this case are fairly lame.Judge Smith first says that "[u]nlike Arnt, the present case does not involve a killing. [read post]
