Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 6281 - 6300 of 6,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 10:29 pm
The inset photo is of the US Courthouse for the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas in Little Rock, home to Bankruptcy Judges Evans, Mixon and Taylor. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm by Russell Jackson
Decision #1:  Connecticut Supreme Court This morning my friends over at Abnormal Use beat me to a description of the most interesting recent case addressing malfunction theory, Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by centerforartlaw
While the vast majority of these relationships proceed without serious problems, there have been many publicized and non-publicized instances in which galleries have used their on-average superior bargaining position to the detriment of certain artists. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, in RFF Family Partnership, LP v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
Fried of the New York County Supreme Court, Commercial Division, granted the defendants' dismissal motion. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Civil Prac & Remedies Code §22.021(2)(B)) extends protection to scholars; whilst the Californian Court of Appeals famously, in O’Grady v Superior Court 44 Cal Rptr 3d 72 (Cal Ct App 2006), interpreted the word ‘periodical’ to find that online journals were protected by state shield laws. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
”5 While it’s true that the Copyright Act doesn’t explicitly refer to secondary liability in so many words, § 106’s grant of the exclusive right “to authorize” in fact indicates Congress’s e [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:23 am
The perfecting of a general notarial bond requires the taking of possession of the movable property under the bond pursuant to a Court order. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:23 am
The perfecting of a general notarial bond requires the taking of possession of the movable property under the bond pursuant to a Court order. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, because of the timeliness issues and the rationale above, the court granted summary judgment to the employer against the hostile work environment allegations based on sex under both Title VII and the DCHRA. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens, born or naturalized, under the stipulations of this Convention. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm by Thomas Kaufman
By Thomas Kaufman  (follow me on Twitter) As anticipated, today the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 10:28 am by Jonathan Pyzer B.A., L.L.B.
Minimum sentences depend on the following factors: Amount of harm inflicted on the complainantThe age of the complainantWhether a firearm was usedIf it is a subsequent offenceWhether the Crown prosecutes by way of indictment or summary offenceNot all sexual assault offences have a mandatory minimum sentence, in which case the judge can use discretion to grant the accused a discharge. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:48 am by Daniel Richardson
Supreme Court decision from 1953 known as May v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Ken
Take it away, Martinez v. [read post]