Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 35,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2009, 9:36 am
United States, No. 08-5657, 2009 WL 160585 (Jan. 26, 2009)The Supreme Court is done pussyfooting around. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit today issued a revised decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 4:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:38 pm
I won't continue to belabor the details of these cases unnecessarily, but in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:31 pm
By Kwame Mensah -- A free-flowing panel discussing the potential impact of Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
First, as this is a State Circuit Court Judge, this ruling only applies to Monroe County. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 12:44 pm
Johnson argues that the Eleventh Circuit's decision conflicts with the well-established principle that state legislatures and state courts, rather than federal judges, define the elements of a state criminal offense. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:15 am
DeStefano which is now before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:11 pm
United States HHS, 808 F.3d 1 (May 20, 2015), Judge Garland was part of the en banc panel that denied a rehearing in a case that rejected a religious non-profit's challenge to the Obamacare contraceptive mandate compromise. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
United States, the nondelegation doctrine is “not an element readily enforceable by the courts. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:30 am
United States, 674 F.3d 621 (7th Cir. 2011).You tell em Judge Hill. [read post]
21 May 2010, 2:15 pm
United States, No. 09-1408. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 12:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2006, 7:31 am
See US v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
If McCulloch v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm
Now that the Supreme Court's holding in Kiobel v. [read post]