Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 6281 - 6300 of 8,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2011, 3:31 am
Representation by a layperson in an administrative disciplinary proceeding Sam v Metro-North Commuter Railroad, App. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The classic “commuting expenses are not deductible” axiom meets the case of the “Commuting Cops” and one of my favorite cases that I have my students read, Margaret Green v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:16 am by Gary L. Francione
On July 7, 2011, the Humane Society of the United States and United Egg Producers announced that they would “work together to seek a federal law that would require larger cages and other improved conditions for the nation’s 280 million laying hens. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by NL
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by NL
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 10:34 pm by David Jacobson
In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 761 Optus was ordered to pay to the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty of $5.26 million for misleading advertisements (Optus 1 was previously discussed here). [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am by Expert Witness Guru
MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., laying down the foundation of admissibility of scientific expert testimony. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:39 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Paying for Dropped Calls Every Month: Thank the Supreme Court and its 2010 Term - Washington, DC lawyer Steven Berk on his blog, The Corporate Observer UPDATE: Apple v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., LLC v Carbone ; 2011 NY Slip Op 05664 Decided on June 28, 2011 ; Appellate Division, Second Department  we see the rare occasion in which legal malpractice may lay against the other side's attorney. [read post]