Search for: "Legall v. State" Results 6281 - 6300 of 88,737
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2023, 9:39 am by HRWatchdog
To confirm that your drivers are subject to the FMCSA, we recommend consulting with your company’s legal counsel. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Never mind Brexit, what is coming up on the UK internet legal scene in the coming year? [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:16 pm
On Tuesday morning, the Court will hear argument in Gross v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:25 am by Kent Scheidegger
  It is an "original jurisdiction" case, states suing each other over river water:  Kansas v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 9:46 pm
The Legal Service reminds EU member states that they can't just go off and make their own agreements to cover areas that fall within the EU's exclusive competence. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:23 am by John Steele
      Brad Hildebrandt offers his views on the state of the Indian legal profession. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
Citing with approval the recent  judgment of the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by Covington & Burling LLP
”  It further authorizes the state attorney general to initiative legal proceedings or intervene in legal proceedings on behalf of call recipients and recover all costs of the investigation and prosecution if the caller is found guilty. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Brandenburg, and how other states have tried or succeeded in legalizing aid in dying. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:25 am
The question involves both state and federal law, especially now that marijuana is at least partly legal in many states, but still illegal under federal law. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:03 pm
The news from IOWA: As the New York Times reports on Iowa's same-sex marriage case argued on December 9: The legal core of the case, Varnum v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:24 am by Ronald Mann
The legal question in the case is whether ERISA preempts that statute (and the dozens of similar statutes adopted by other states). [read post]