Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2008, 2:42 pm
The applicability of the Rules made a difference to Wal-Mart, which was arguing that the Court didn't have subject matter jurisdiction because the DOR hadn't issued a summons and filed a Complaint. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:44 pm
None of the specific arguments mattered. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:03 pm
You can’t put the money back or make the up the contribution at a later date. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Holyfield, 490 U.S. at 36, 109 S.Ct. 1597; see 25 USC ' 1911[b]). [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm
QUESTION: There have been issues that residents don’t feel comfortable bringing up at the board meeting (open forum). [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
It held that contrary to Matter of Barbara T. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 10:32 pm
§ 1501(b). [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:20 am
Therefore, in line with a client’s ongoing needs, a team is typically formed to address specific legal matters. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 6:14 am
” Detroit News columnist Blanche B. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:44 pm
He went further (and further than he needed to), again in my humble opinion correctly, by saying that the status as “homeless” does not necessarily depend on a formal s 184 decision, but might be raised in other matters such as a Part 6 application - he doesn’t refer to s 183 but that would support his construction. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:26 am
G.S. 8-57(b). [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:26 am
G.S. 8-57(b). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:19 pm
” RSA 564-B:8-814(b). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
[I]t is immaterial whether the beliefs sought to be advanced by association pertain to political, economic, religious or cultural matters, and state action which may have the effect of curtailing the freedom to associate is subject to the closest scrutiny. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 6:22 am
” I don’t see a lot of room for debate here, although the application of the other requirements of Rule 23, of course, remain hotly debated by the courts. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 8:00 am
"[t]he name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each individual likely to have information discoverable under Rule 26(b), including for impeachment or rebuttal, identifying the subjects of the information. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 1:49 am
There isn't a lot of law dealing with spam at the moment. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:44 pm
He went further (and further than he needed to), again in my humble opinion correctly, by saying that the status as “homeless” does not necessarily depend on a formal s 184 decision, but might be raised in other matters such as a Part 6 application - he doesn’t refer to s 183 but that would support his construction. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
§ 78j(b), the “fiduciary duty” element must be proved under well-established principles of state law, or whether -- as the court below held -- courts may define and impose the applicable fiduciary duty as a matter of federal common law; and (3) whether exculpatory testimony given by a witness during a deposition in a closely related federal enforcement proceeding is admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b) in a subsequent criminal trial when the… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:00 pm
I wanted to blog a bit on what that means and why it matters. [read post]
