Search for: "Mark"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 152,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 5:40 pm
The 12 men and women have placed a question mark on the legitimacy of Trump’s first and potentially only term in the White House. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 5:35 am
International Trademark Registration 10.20.23 | By: Thomas Dunlap The blog post, “What are the Types of Trademarks,” explained the distinction between Trademarks, Service Marks, State Marks, Federal Marks, and Common Law Marks, which are common types of protection for marks in the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 11:25 am
Microsoft's motion for summary judgment in its opposition to Apple's attempt to register its APP STORE mark ended with something of a whimper last week, with the TTAB denying the motion with essentially no substantive discussion. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:28 am
Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss defendant's false marking counterclaims for failure to state a claim was granted. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:48 am
Following on from his ruling that Idameneo’s use of its trade mark breached its contractual obligation not to use a trade mark capable of being confused with Symbion’s trade mark, Jessup J has granted an injunction: The Respondent be permanently restrained, whether by itself or through its subsidiaries from using the Respondent’s Mark. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:18 am
This mark was subsequently registered in 2011. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:22 am
Does Mark’s claim stand a chance? [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:21 pm
I will be making a presentation at the Taiwanese Canadian Community Service Association on the topic of commercial law on July 14, 2012 from 2:00pm to 3:30pm. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:10 am
Amplify Federal Credit Union , Opposition No. 91228233 [Section 2(d) priority contest involving two applicants seeking to register the mark AMPLIFY, in standard character form, for charitable fundraising services].October 30, 2018 - 10 AM: In re Starbucks Corporation, Serial No. 85792872 [Refusal to register an alleged mark consisting of a green circle placed centrally on the front exterior side of a white cup, for "Coffee, tea, coffee and tea based beverages, and cocoa;… [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:58 am
The USPTO refused registration of I'M SMOKING HOT for cosmetics, makeup, and other personal care products, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark SMOKIN' HOT SHOW TIME for cosmetics. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 3:35 am
The mark looks like TINY I. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 3:29 am
These factors weighed heavily against applicant.Turning to the marks, the Board found that applicant's mark is "similar to" the DENT KRAFTERS mark. [read post]
"DARK DECEPTION: MONSTERS & MORTALS" for Game Software Not Confusable with MONSTER ENERGY, Says TTAB
29 Aug 2023, 3:42 am
" Accordingly, consumers are likely to view “MONSTERS & MORTALS” as a whole, and take from Applicant’s mark a different meaning and commercial impression than Opposer’s MONSTER ENERGY marks and its family of MONSTER-formative marks. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:33 am
"Applicant's mark suggests lightness and freshness whereas Opposer's marks suggest darkness and elegance. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 7:43 am
A registration is being applied-for, not a mark. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:50 am
The Board, however, dismissed opposer's Section 2(d) claim based on its famous mark SWATCH for identical goods, ruling that the marks were so different as to make confusion unlikely. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:13 am
This overlap also reduces the degree of similarity required between the mark to support a likelihood of confusion finding.As to the marks, registrant's mark YONCÉ might be perceived as a shortened version of FEYONCE. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:39 am
But what about the marks? [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:38 am
For sure, it cannot come under famous trade mark infringement, although it could fall within the ambit of the provisions on misleading marks and marks infringing earlier non-registered rights, as OAEE does not own a trade mark in Class 45. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 7:36 am
As a result, the first to use the unregistered mark (the senior user) cannot claim priority over a subsequent remote use of the mark by another person (the junior user) who adopted the mark in good faith.The issue addressed here arises when one or both of the users of the same or similar unregistered mark expand into one another’s territory. [read post]
