Search for: "People v. House" Results 6281 - 6300 of 12,872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am by Lawfare Staff
Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs admitted to being “highly concerned” about the potential ramifications of the Philippines v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
 That is the case, now usually called United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 8:04 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
“I’m looking for people who understand the way the real world works,” Clinton said. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:38 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The article has been cited numerous times by academic researchers and in an amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court in Friedrichs v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
  He also proudly proclaims his identity as a democratic socialist and his esteem for Eugene V. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 11:37 am by Law Offices of David L. Freidberg, P.C.
However, that all changed as a result of the ruling in the Supreme Court’s 1972 case Morrissey v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
He tries to reassure those people that they `are not in trouble’ and that, even though medical treatment is expensive, their immediate health is more important than the cost. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
A quick, non-exclusive list of common examples we frequently encounter are: Facts alleged by the declarant without foundation, i.e. without personal and direct sensory observation of the matter asserted (e.g. my husband smacked the child because I saw the child had a bruise when I picked her up from his house); Conclusory statements subject to less abstract, more specific ways of conveying the information (e.g. he is an abuser, or she is a liar); Legal conclusions that… [read post]