Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 6281 - 6300 of 178,437
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Employer then rejected Plaintiff 's demand for indemnification, contending it had no duty to indemnify employees outside the scope of its insurance coverage. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Employer then rejected Plaintiff 's demand for indemnification, contending it had no duty to indemnify employees outside the scope of its insurance coverage. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Employer then rejected Plaintiff 's demand for indemnification, contending it had no duty to indemnify employees outside the scope of its insurance coverage. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Court of Chancery, Mar. 6, 2017), Vice Chancellor Slights ruled for the plaintiff in the case and concluding that the defendant “has engaged in blatant violations of court orders and bad faith litigation conduct that justify serious sanctions”, ordering him to pay two-thirds of the plaintiffs counsel’s fees and expenses and all of the plaintiffs computer forensic expert’s fees and expenses. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 8:20 am
A plaintiff in a discrimination claim acknowledged and accepted the terms of a settlement in open court. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 2:34 am by Ron Coleman
The post Where there’s smokes appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 10:22 am by Patricia Salkin
Defendants denied Plaintiffs’ application on the grounds that the type of facility which Plaintiffs sought to erect was not permitted under the Township’s Zoning Ordinance. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm by admin
” This rule entitles a Plaintiff to recover all of his or her damages from any one Defendant, even if there are additional Defendants who are also found liable for a single injury to the Plaintiff. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:07 pm
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) allows for a plaintiff to serve a defendant after the 120 day service period in certain circumstances. . . .. . . [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Steven V. Buckman
Defendant moved to dismiss the lawsuit based on Plaintiffs perjury and prevailed. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm by Steven V. Buckman
The railroad filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting: 1) the accident was proximately caused by Plaintiffs negligence; and 2) all of Plaintiffs claims were preempted by federal law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 6:16 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Mar. 23, 2022), plaintiff and his wife lived in the Rivertrail neighborhood and were members of the defendant homeowner’s association (HOA). [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
Keith Stephens filed suit against the defendant, City of Los Angeles alleging that the City’s restrictions on off-site commercial billboards, Section 14.4.4.B.11 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (“LAMC”), violated plaintiffs’ free speech and equal protection rights. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:48 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Der-Yeghiayan denied plaintiff Real-Time Reporters’ (“RTR”) preliminary injunction motion in this Lanham Act matter involving RTR’s REAL-TIME REPORTERS trademark. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:48 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Der-Yeghiayan denied plaintiff Real-Time Reporters’ (“RTR”) preliminary injunction motion in this Lanham Act matter involving RTR’s REAL-TIME REPORTERS trademark. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 9:25 pm
The California Supreme Court has denied the plaintiffs' petition for review in Holdgrafer v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:59 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
Actual damages are often measured by the value of the plaintiffs lost license fee, or lost royalties. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Oh yeah, the complained-of conduct must only be on account of the plaintiff's gender. [read post]