Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 6281 - 6300
of 9,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24–27. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
The 6-3 arithmetic speaks for itself in this instance.As per the Court’s summary, BREYER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
Robert Newlen, Assistant Law Librarian for Collections, Outreach, and Services – Robert chose Marshall v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
In Robert W. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Co. (1933, Mont.) 26 P2d 175 [periodic immersion of injured hand into hot water]; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1919 Neb.) 173 NW 689 [x-ray procedure requiring injection of contrast substance into the kidney]; Cardinal v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
It is in this atmosphere that the idea of a national security court as a solution to the problem — an idea that for a long time existed only on the margins of the debate about U.S. counterterrorism policy but is now entertained by more mainstream thinkers such as Senator Diane Feinstein and a man I respect greatly, my former client Robert Gates – has gained momentum. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
In the words of Justice Robert C. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 2:05 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 2:05 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
Appealed from the United States District Court of Rhode Island, Providence. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Roberts, et al., v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
During the oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:46 pm
Moreover, this case further tilts the circuit split in favor of United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am
Pamela Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, & Artemus Ward, The Puzzle of Unanimity: Consensus on the United States Supreme Court (Stanford Law Books, May 2013) Drawing on data from the U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But his list would be a remarkable beginning: (1) Eliminate gerrymandered Congressional districts (which could be done with lawsuits); (2) End the Senate’s dysfunctional filibuster rules (which should have been done earlier, but Democrats got suckered again by Republicans); (3) Adjust corrupt lobbying laws that now unduly favor former members of Congress working for special interests; (4) Aggressively test and re-test the Supreme Court’s Citizen United ruling (Democrats… [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
