Search for: "S. W. v. State" Results 6281 - 6300 of 14,906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 One of the Legislature’s stated purposes in amending Section 90.702 was “to adopt the standards for expert testimony in the courts of this state as provided in Daubert v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
`[W]here the well-pleaded facts do not permit the court to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct,’ a factual allegation has been stated, `but it has not show[n] that the pleader is entitled to relief,’ as required by Rule 8(a). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit — the federal appellate court that handles federal cases from western states, including California — confirmed this in Long Beach Area Peace Network v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:50 am
 This means that "[w]hile Article 14 ... was intended to homogenise the legal systems relating to the costs applicable to intellectual property proceedings in all the Member States, it was not aimed at creating parity or narrowing the gap between the lawyers’ fees of the Member States, which are markedly different from one other. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
I think it’s actually quite something that, by the time George W. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm by Miriam Seifter
The government faced an uphill battle in Wednesday’s argument in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]