Search for: "SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 29,241
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Family Court Act § 1028-a provides:§ 1028-a. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
Gallagher, joined by Judge Frank Celebrezze, Jr., the Eight District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am
Monday’s second case is Georgia v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:01 am
Nocera et al, March 8, 2019, Florida’s 5th District Court of Appeals The post Florida Injury Law Insight: Rear-End Collisions and Rebuttable Presumption appeared first on Broward Injury Lawyer Blog. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
That’s a question only the district court can answer. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:08 am
Last week, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed its answering brief (prior coverage and commentary: 1, 2, 3) to Qualcomm's Ninth Circuit appeal of the agency's antitrust victory in the Northern District of California. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 7:56 am
The Appeal In a split decision authored by Judge Jeffrey Froelich, and joined by Judge Mary Donovan, the Second District Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment as to the imposition of court-appointed counsel fees and remanded for the filing of an amended judgment entry omitting the imposition of court-appointed counsel fees. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
DefamationGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at an interesting decision from the Amsterdam district court which ordered Google to remove negative reviews from Google Maps's review section after concluding that they were fake.Economics and IPFormer PermaKat Nicola Searle shares her thoughts on the current state of the impact of economics on IP, and as a bonus asks for feedback from Kat readers.IP EducationThe IP Education Series is back! [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 9:08 am
The California Court of Appeal for the Second District said no in O.G. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 8:11 am
The district court denied Banister’s habeas petition and declined to issue a certificate of appealability to allow him to appeal that denial to the U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
Hong Kongers went to the polls on Nov. 24 in the city’s district council elections—the first vote available to the city’s residents since protests against encroachment by Beijing began six months ago. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:55 am
In this case, Lykins appealed her conviction in the Franklin Municipal Court for violating the city of Franklin’s unified development ordinance. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
London Borough of Waltham Forest v Saleh (2019) EWCA Civ 1944 The Court of Appeal on section 202 Housing Act 1996 reviews of suitability and what facts should be relevant at the time of review. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 12:44 pm
In their motion for stay pending appeal and for immediate administrative stay, the DOJ noted that this is the second time in history a court has required a senior presidential advisor to testify before Congress. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:55 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, in a unanimous decision, sided with the district court (and, thus, with the bank and the FDIC). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:18 am
The appeals court is reversed, and the trial court’s order imposing restitution is reinstated. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Second, the relator had argued that the district court improperly considered the defendants’ arguments challenging the jury’s finding of materiality and knowledge as to the Medicare false claims because those issues had not been properly preserved for appeal pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:24 pm
On appeal, the Second Circuit affirmed on both points. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit upheld that ruling. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:44 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit explained in its 1997 decision in In re Sealed Case, that discussion in Nixon means that “[a] party seeking to overcome a claim of presidential privilege must demonstrate: first, that each discrete group of the subpoenaed materials likely contains important evidence; and second, that this evidence is not available with due diligence elsewhere. [read post]
