Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 6281 - 6300 of 10,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
United States, 505 U.S. 144, 156—159, 177 (1992). [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm by Richard Hunt
 Scott Johnson and his lawyers are among the most prolific serial filers in the United States, but the Ninth Circuit has eliminated any meaningful standing requirement in ADA cases, so the only real defense is compliance with the law. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
They argued that their clients shouldn’t have to pay taxes (United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:57 am
Proposals for contributions, not exceeding 500 words and accompanied by a short biography, are to be sent until May 15, 2017 to Ms. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
 "waters of the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
As a matter of our domestic law, we could take the decision in A v United Kingdom into account but nevertheless prefer our own view. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:53 pm by Ron Coleman
 In short, the Fourth Circuit’s Balmora decision holds that in passing Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, Congress intended to protect Mexican citizens from coming to the United States and buying merchandise bearing ersatz Mexican trademarks that have never been used in commerce in the United States before they return to Mexico, because these visitors, Congress concluded, bring their goodwill with them. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am by Rory Little
United States (1998, in which Justice Breyer wrote for the majority) that first advanced the constitutional theory adopted by the Court in Apprendi v. [read post]
9 Aug 2006, 4:56 pm
  But the Secretary of State's speech was nothing short of masterful! [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:24 pm by Steve Kalar
A slow week in the Ninth lets us reach back to discuss the strong decision by Judge Goodwin in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am by Caroline E. Oks and Brielle A. Basso
United States, have been criticized as they deprive the producing party of its right to withhold production of privileged material. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]