Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 6281 - 6300 of 41,724
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2021, 7:52 am by Nedim Malovic
Furthermore, the marks also had at least an average degree of conceptual similarity.In light of all of the above, the General Court considered that the Board had been correct in finding that there was a likelihood of confusion within the meaning of Article 8(1)(b) of the EUTMR.CommentThe decision is a nice application of the well-established approach to onomatopoeias. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:04 am by Jan von Hein
Secondly, by examining more briefly the significance for the EU and its Member States of the change in the UK’s status from Member State to third country. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:49 am by Howard Friedman
 At issue is a California administrative rule requiring non-profit organizations that wish to solicit tax deductible contributions in the state to file an annual report that includes an unredacted IRS Form 990 Schedule B. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
Gutnick responded with a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a valid claim. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Manchester Building Society (Appellant) v Grant Thornton UK LLP (Respondent), heard 13-14 October 2020 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others… [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 10:31 pm by Jay L. Levine
In the instant case, AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 10:31 pm by Jay Levine
In the instant case, AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm by Shannon O'Hare
At the federal level, United States trademark law is governed by the Trademark Act of 1946, or the Lanham Act, which provides for, among other [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am by Amy Howe
The case, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 8:58 am by Dan Harris
This is completely optional, but it is important to state clearly whether or not you will be using this approach. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:47 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/510(b) “Property provisions of an agreement are never modifiable. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 2:16 pm by Ronald Mann
ShareMy post summarizing the oral argument in AMG Capital Management v. [read post]