Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 28,965
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2019, 3:52 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at two “cases [that] will shed light on how far constitutional limitations protect against government power in immigration matters” —Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:35 am
The hearing was part of a series to educate the subcommittee on the current state of U.S. patent law in light of the proposed STRONGER Patents Act of 2019. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:03 am
Contested decisionIn reaching its decision the examining division held that the deletion of this feature met none of the criteria specified in the Guidelines H-V.3.1 (often referred to as the "essentiality test") according to which the removal of a feature from a claim is only allowable if the skilled person would directly and unambiguously recognise that:(i) the feature was not explained as essential in the disclosure;(ii) the feature is not indispensable for the function of the… [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
It did, however, bring to light the progression of the reproductive justice framework and gaps where there is work to be done. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:58 am
Last month, the Supreme Judicial Court issued Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
In Szurovecz v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:29 am
In light of the above remarks, the SC reversed the appellate ruling. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:05 am
The Directive must be implemented in Member States by 2021. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court evaluated sobriety checkpoints (at which everyone must stop and submit to observation and answer some questions) under the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures, Justice Stevens, in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:44 pm
For example, in West v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:02 pm
NAACP and McAleenan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 1:45 pm
., Petitioners v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 11:47 am
In 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case and then sent it back to the lower court for another look in light of Ziglar v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 7:07 am
Kobre & Kim asserts its request will shed light on the unusual and unprecedented terms the agency agreed to in its attempted settlement of the matter, which included a “gag” provision by which the parties agreed to make no public statements about the case, other than those already in the public record (Kobre & Kim LLP v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:45 am
V. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decided Rocket v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:08 am
In Liqwd, Inc. v. [read post]
