Search for: "THU L" Results 6281 - 6300 of 12,832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
 In Quality King Distributors, Inc. v L'anza Research Int'l, Inc., the Supreme Court held in 1998 that §602(a)(1), which refers to §106(3)'s exclusive distribution right, incorporates the "first sale" doctrine limitation. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  Third, it protects defendant by ensuring that those persons who will be bound by the final judgment are clearly identifiable.Carrera, 727 F.3d at 305-06 (quoting Marcus, 687 F.3d at 593).Thus, ascertainability, as applied in the Third Circuit has two primary attributes:[A]scertainability entails two important elements. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In L’Oreal SA –v- eBay International AG [2012] Bus LR 1369 at [139] the Court had stated that the measures required of an online service provider cannot consist in an active monitoring of all the data of each of its customers in order to prevent any future infringement of intellectual property rights. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:57 am by Blue Blog
Thus, it was very beneficial to me to make the connections with these other Atlanta Legal Experts. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:57 am by Blue Blog
Thus, it was very beneficial to me to make the connections with these other Atlanta Legal Experts. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:57 am by Blue Blog
Thus, it was very beneficial to me to make the connections with these other Atlanta Legal Experts. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:30 am by Jani
The chair itself consisted of two L-shaped upright pieces, which contained slots, into which platforms and other pieces could be slotted into, forming the chair. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
In August 2012, L’Ouragan published three articles that heavily criticised the State Prosecutor, Placide Nikiéma. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am by Terry Hart
And only a few days later (October 4th), King filed a lawsuit against 20th Century Fox Record Corporation and Mister Maestro, Inc. for selling records of the speech without King’s consent.1 The District Court granted a preliminary injunction in December after concluding, “There are thus no principles which prevent relief to plaintiff from what seems the unfair and unjust use by defendants of his speech and his voice. [read post]