Search for: "U.S. v. Mark*" Results 6281 - 6300 of 24,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2016, 6:34 am by John Jascob
 Title VI—Clarifies the treatment of U.S. territories under the Investment Company Act while imposing a safe harbor period of three years and allowing the SEC to extend that period for up to three years. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Sorry, National Review, but the marriage rulings are really nothing at all like Dred Scott [my new piece at The Daily Beast] Or Roe v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:45 am by Broc Romanek
It was an NOL pill, in fact, that became the subject of controversy in Selectica v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises… [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Betty Lupinacci
This new tax was challenged in court and the Supreme Court, in Pollock v. [read post]