Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. "
Results 6281 - 6300
of 8,927
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Today’s case of the day, Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
The verb “abridge” is used as a synonym for discrimination in exactly this way in the Fifteenth Amendment which says “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
United States of America for more information.” [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:57 am
These agreements create a framework for how companies should approach privacy in the United States and around the world. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Supreme Court held in Gregg v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:47 am
Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:39 am
United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
United States of America, — F.3d —-, 2011 WL 5865225 (5th Cir. 2011). [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of one’s… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of one’s speech will be (see Boy… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:02 pm
Based on a statement of interest filed by the State Department with the court, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the matter of La Reunion Aerienne v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 12:10 pm
If you think that corporations have disproportionate influence in American government, you need only look to the Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm
The Supreme Court's Dred Scott v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:59 am
Note that United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:33 am
The charges in those cases were based on violations in Latin America and the middle east, including involvement with United Nations Oil-for-Food Program in Iraq. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:10 am
In a case of “turnabout is fair play,” last Friday, a United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut considered, and disregarded, the USPTO’s reexamination analysis of the same prior art in Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Patchak (Granted )Docket: 11-246Issue(s): (1) Whether the Quiet Title Act and its reservation of the United States' sovereign immunity in suits involving "trust or restricted Indian lands" apply to all suits concerning land in which the United States "claims an interest," 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Donald Rumsfeld and the United States of America, Nos. 10-1687, 10-2442 (7th Cir. [read post]
