Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 6281 - 6300
of 8,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
A few of those are as follows: In the closely watched matter of United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
However, the judge did not err in applying Article 7(1)(e); what he had actually done was to state that the policy underlying that article was relevant to the assessment of whether there was a sufficient similarity for the purposes of Article 9(1)(c), both the mark and the sign being shapes. * An assessment of similarity had to be carried out on a global basis by reference to the degree of similarity between the mark and the sign (here the Court cited Case C-252/07 Intel Corp Inc… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:23 pm
(LabMD, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Janet Kowal v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:31 pm
The People) (Copyrights & Campaigns) US Copyright Group – Law professor defends alleged Hurt Locker pirates (TorrentFreak) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions 9th Circuit: Bad faith intent to profit after innocent registration constitutes cybersquatting: DSPT Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
For instance, in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Why didn’t it work? [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Core Wireless, on the other hand, is a non-United States corporation with one employee that exists solely to license its patent portfolio. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:38 am
Add to this the alleged potential for "abuse" of discretion by the PTO director by virtue of the Supreme Court decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:36 am
Booksellers Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
Judge Easterbrook then goes on to offer some interesting perspectives about the current state of Section 8 enforcement: Actually, the chance of a suit by the United States or the FTC is not even 1%. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
Mexichem Specialty Resins, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 3:09 pm
" United States Parole Comm'n v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Macy’s Inc., 2023 WL 8811499, No. 1:17-cv-754 (S.D. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:32 am
United States Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:49 am
De Simone v. [read post]
